About this site
The FPTP voting method for General Elections in the UK has serious flaws. FPTP can produce an electoral result where the party that ‘wins’ is not the party to win the largest number of votes in the election. That alone should disqualify its claims to be a fair or democratic system. In addition third or fourth parties are marginalised, so that substantial minorities are ignored. By contrast, a small faction of the government party can have disproportionate influence. But this is not the only problem. Safe seats mean MPs can be appointed to parliament by their parties. The beanbag gets elected as long as it sports the right coloured rosette. Added to this, ‘winning’ the election depends on campaigns in just a few marginal constituencies. FPTP infects our politics with a counterproductive adversarial approach and the lowest common denominator of argument, and this spills over into policy. No wonder politicians are held in such low esteem and turnout rates at elections are so low. A better system would allow you a free choice to vote for the best party to form the Government, and also for the best candidate to be the MP. Direct Party and Representative Voting is the better system we need in place of FPTP. It would be a fairer system, giving voters a better choice, and it would be an important step along the road to rebuilding our politics. As a replacement for FPTP, DPR Voting offers more advantages and fewer disadvantages than any other system. If you are concerned about politics, look at this system carefully. Stephen Johnson had the original idea for DPR Voting, and set up the website. |