Direct Party and Representative Voting (DPR)

Voting Systems compared, with special reference to STV.

DPR Voting - simple, practical, yet powerful electoral reform

Electoral systems differ in the way they translate national votes into legislative seats. Proportional Representation (PR) systems try to reduce the disparity between a party's percentage of the national vote and its share of the parliamentary votes, so if a party wins 30% of the votes in the country, it should win approximately 30% of the votes in the Parliament.
Compare Direct Party and Representative Voting (DPR Voting) with other voting systems
A simple Voting System Comparison
Delivers Proportional Representation Government
Single member Constituency MP
Uses Party List
Uses Multimember Constituencies
Wasted Votes
One type of MP
Simple Vote?
Simple Count?
Simple to understand
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Single Transferable Vote (STV)
APPROX
NO
NO
YES
NOT MANY
YES
YES
NO
NO
Additional Member System
MMP
AMS
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
Closed Party List
List PR
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
The Alternative Vote
AV
NO
YES
NO
NO
NOT MANY
YES
YES
NO
YES
Alternative Vote Plus
AV+
APPROX
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
Total Representation
TR
APPROX
NO
YES
NO
NOT MANY
NO
YES
NO
NO
Supplementary vote
SV
NO
YES
NO
NO
NOT MANY
YES
YES
YES
YES
The Limited Vote
NO
NO
NO
YES
NOT MANY
YES
YES
YES
YES
Approval voting
NO
YES
NO
NO
NOT MANY
YES
YES
YES
YES
The Borda Count
NO
YES
NO
NO
NOT MANY
YES
YES
YES
NO
                     
DPR Voting
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
Delivers Proportional Representation Government
Single member Constituency MP
Uses Party List
Uses Multimember Constituencies
Wasted Votes
One type of MP
Simple Vote?
Simple Count?
Simple to Understand
 
The Single Transferable Vote (STV) is promoted as a PR system for the UK.
Compare STV with DPR Voting

First Past the Post (FPTP)
‘First past the post' is a way of voting combined with a way of counting the votes. It can be used for single and multiple member constituency elections. In a single member election the candidate with the highest number, not necessarily a majority, of votes is elected. When this method is used to elect MPs to parliament in a single member, party based election, this method can result in significant distortions.
The number of MPs elected for each party is unlikely to be proportionate to the number of votes cast nationwide for the different parties. Small parties with thinly spread support may have proportionately fewer MPs elected. Coversely a small party with tightly concentrated support may have proportionately more MPs elected. It is possible for party A to have fewer votes than party B but still have more MPs, and thus be able to form the Government.
FPTP is used in the UK, Canada, and eleswhere. It favours a two political party system

Single Transferable Vote (STV)
The single transferable vote (STV) is a voting system designed to achieve a more proportional result. There are variations of the system. To achieve proportionality the system requires constituencies to be organised as multi member constituencies. A form of preferential voting is used. Counting is complex. Each vote is initially allocated to the voter's preferred candidate. Depending on the number of electors and the number of candidates, each candidate needs a minimum number of votes to be elected. Counting is done in stages. A candidate is eliminated at each stage. When a candidate is eliminated, or has enough votes to be elected, surplus votes are transferred to the remaining candidates. There are different methods of doing this.
While not a strictly proportional electoral system, results may be broadly proportional, although this does depend on the interplay between the numbers of parties competing in the election and the size of the multimember constituencies.
STV is used in Ireland , Australia , and elsewhere.

Additional Member System (Mixed Member Proportional)
Additional Member System - AMS (Mixed Member Proportional - MMP) is a voting system designed to achieve a more proportional result. There are variations of the system. To achieve proportionality the system requires members to be elected in two ways – by election as a constituency MP and by election from a party list. In most models the voter casts two votes: one for a constituency representative and one for a party. The constituency MPs are elected by FPTP within their constituency but the total number of MPs for each party is determined by the parrty vote. Additional Members are elected from the party list in order to achieve an overall proportional result.
If a party wins more constituency seats than justified by its proportion of the total vote, the size of the Parliament is increased so that the overall outcome is proportional to the votes, with other parties receiving additional list seats.
AMS /MMP is used in Germany, Scotland, and elsewhere

Party List Proportional Representation
Party-list proportional representation is a voting system designed to achieve proportional representation (PR) In a closed parly list system, voters vote directly for the party. Parties make lists of candidates to be elected, and seats get allocated to each party in proportion to the number of votes the party receives. The larger the size of the constituency, the more proportional the result.
There are variations to this system. Party Lists are also incorporated into other electoral systems eg Additional Member System
Party Lists are used in israel, Italy and elsewhere. UK Members of the European Parliament are elected by a closed list system.

The Alternative Vote (AV)
The Alternative Vote also known as Instant-runoff voting (IRV), preferential voting, and ranked choice voting, is a voting system used to elect a single winner. Voters rank candidates in order of preference. Counting is in stages. Votes for the first choice candidate are counted as one vote. If a candidate secures a majority of votes cast, that candidate wins. Otherwise, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. The ballots of the eliminated candidate(s) are re-counted as one vote for the highest ranked candidate remaining on the ballot. This process continues until a winning candidate receives a majority of the votes.
AV is used in Australia and elsewhere. It is often to elect leaders of groups, and Mayors.

Alternative Vote Plus (AV+)
The Alternative Vote Plus, is a semi-proportional voting system invented by the 1998 Jenkins Commission.
AV+ is an additional member system. As in the Alternative Vote voting system, candidates are ranked numerically in order of preference. To ensure proportionality, an additional group of members are elected through a regional party lists system. These members are 20% of the whole parliament. Constituency boundaries would need to be redrawn to accommodate a smaller number of constituency MPs.
The system is untried.

Total Representation
Total Representation involves election of Constituency and ‘Party' MPs. Constituency MPs are elected by the FPTP method. Party MPs are elected by pooling all the votes cast for the unsuccessful candidates in all the constituencies and dividing them proportionally among all the parties which fielded candidates in the election.
Constituency boundaries would need to be redrawn to accommodate a smaller number of constituency MPs.
The system is untried.

Direct Party and Representative Voting (DPR Voting)
DPR Voting is a direct replacement for the 'First past the post' - FPTP - voting system. It is a form of Proportional Representation based on single member constituencies for multi party parliamentary democracies.
It does not require additional list or top up MPs.

It has advantages over STV as a direct replacement for FPTP. see comparison
DPR Voting is a way of introducing proportionality to our political system while retaining much of the existing familiar electoral system. It addresses the main criticisms of the FPTP and avoids the main criticisms of other proposed systems of electoral reform.
The voter casts two votes: one for a constituency representative and one for a party.
The introduction of DPR Voting would involve only the smallest change to our current electoral system. It would preserve the relationship between MPs and their constituents on the basis of a method of constituency election which is familiar. DPR Voting would achieve greater equality for the voter, greater voter choice, and a significant increase in proportionality at minimum cost and disruption. It could be simply and powerfully presented to the electorate as a fairer electoral system for Westminster.
 
Comparison of the features of DPR Voting and STV (The Single Transferable Vote)
STV
DPR Voting
PR
STV – voting power in Parliament is approx proportional to overall votes
DPR Voting – voting power in Parliament is proportional to overall votes
Constituencies
STV is intended for Multimember constituencies
DPR Voting is intended for single member constituencies and would not need constituency sizes to change.
Constituency Boundaries.
Boundaries and constituency size are potentially contentious, and are important to the way the system works
Boundaries and constituency sizes are not important to the way the system works and do not affect the election result.
Party Neutrality
STV favours, or works better with, a three party system
DPR Voting can accommodate any number of parties but small party representation depends on where the threshold is set.
Simplicity
Ease of voting depends in part on the size of the constituency and the number of candidates.
Counting is a complex process.
The electoral system is difficult to explain.
Voting and counting are simple, quick and familiar.
The basics of the system are easy to explain
It would require some changes to the way MPs vote in parliament
Wasted Votes
A few. Some voters will still find that their first preference candidate never gets elected.
There are no wasted votes. Every vote cast makes a (small) difference to the result of the election.
Safe Seats
There are no safe seats in either system
Tactical Voting
With STV, there is some scope for tactical voting.
With DPR Voting, tactical voting is redundant.
‘Marginals'
The significance of Marginal Constituencies is much reduced.
There are no Marginal constituencies
Voter Choice
STV – the voter may have a choice of candidates from within one party from which to choose.
DPR Voting – the voter has two votes, one for their choice of party, and one for their choice of MP. The voter can vote for the party of choice and the candidate of choice without the one compromising the other.
Party Lists
Neither system uses a Party list.
In Parliament
STV - Parliament would be populated with MPs from different parties in numbers broadly proportional to the votes cast for the parties.
DPR Voting – Parliament would be populated with MPs considered to be the best potential MPs irrespective of party nomination. It is not possible to say if this would reflect the present plurality system or whether the mix would in time reflect overall voting trends.
Small Party Representation.
STV would increase small party representation.
DPR Voting makes small party representation proportional. For very small parties, this depends on the threshold for representation, and the party qualification requirements
Independent MPs
It would be hard for Independent MPs to be elected because many votes will still be cast for a party label. In addition the candidate has a much larger constituency to campaign over.
DPR Voting – Party labels would be less of a handicap to the Independent Candidates and the smaller constituency would make campaigning easier.
Psephology
STV - interpreting voting results is complex.
DPR Voting – Party voting would be simpler to interpret than under FPTP, but psephologists would find a brand new area of interest in local results to interpret, comparing and interpreting the winning MPs voting share with the winning party's voting share in the constituency.
The Principal outcomes of DPR Voting:
..
  • A form of proportional representation is achieved with minimal change to the voting system.
  • The existing system of single member constituencies is retained.
  • The existing system of electing MPs is retained.
  • The elections of the MP and the party of government are not conflated, improving voter choice.
  • There are no safe seats.
  • Voting in 'marginal' constituencies cannot determine the election of the Government.
  • Simplicity of voting and counting is comparable with FPTP.
  • Each vote in every constituency makes a difference to the result of the election.
  • Frequent revision to constituency boundaries is not required to retain this fairness.
..
Note: Voting is not preferential
  Multimember constituencies are not used
  Party Lists are not used
Multimember constituencies(MMCs) have disadvantages compared to single member constituencies (SMCs)

Single Member constituencies (SMCs)

  • SMCs are smaller geographically, and have smaller numbers of constituents
  • Being smaller they encourage personal and local involvement in politics:
  • The MP can be better aware of, and responsive to, the concerns of constituents.
  • Individual candidates can be known locally, even if they are not nationally prominent.
  • Election campaigns can be conducted by small organisations at lower cost per candidate.
  • Smaller constituencies encourage local involvement in campaigns rather than central control.
  • Personal contact between MPs, candidates, and constituents is easier, and thus more likely.

Multi Member constituencies (MMCs)

  • MMCs typically have 5 members and are therefore 5 times bigger than single member constituencies
  • Having several MPs elected for your constituency means you have a choice of MP to contact. (but each MP has a very much larger constituency to cover.)
  • Larger MMCs disadvantage Independent candidates who may have limited campaigning resources.
  • An MP may have to do much more travelling in a larger constituency
  • In an inner city MMC the geographical size of the constituency may be manageable, but in rural areas the sheer size of a 5 member MMC may make it impractical for constituents to visit their MP, or vice versa, so MMCs are reduced to, eg, 3 member constituencies
  • The number of members in the MMC can influence the working of the chosen electoral system. eg STV
A brief summary of the different systems in use in the UK
(House of Commons Library - a paper written in 2008)


 

Direct Party and Representative Voting is a form of Proportional representation (PR) which has the simplicity of the existing 'First past the post' system, maintains the single member constituency, and requires little change to the existing voting system
 

DPR Voting - simple, practical, yet powerful electoral reform

Return to home page