DPR Voting - simple, practical, yet powerful electoral reform
|
| Electoral systems differ in the way they translate national votes into legislative seats. Proportional Representation (PR) systems try to reduce the disparity between a party's percentage of the national vote and its share of the parliamentary votes, so if a party wins 30% of the votes in the country, it should win approximately 30% of the votes in the Parliament. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compare Direct Party and Representative Voting (DPR Voting) with other voting systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Single Transferable Vote (STV) is promoted as a PR system for the UK. Compare STV with DPR Voting |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Past the Post (FPTP) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Single Transferable Vote (STV) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Member System (Mixed Member Proportional) Additional Member System - AMS (Mixed Member Proportional - MMP) is a voting system designed to achieve a more proportional result. There are variations of the system. To achieve proportionality the system requires members to be elected in two ways – by election as a constituency MP and by election from a party list. In most models the voter casts two votes: one for a constituency representative and one for a party. The constituency MPs are elected by FPTP within their constituency but the total number of MPs for each party is determined by the parrty vote. Additional Members are elected from the party list in order to achieve an overall proportional result. If a party wins more constituency seats than justified by its proportion of the total vote, the size of the Parliament is increased so that the overall outcome is proportional to the votes, with other parties receiving additional list seats. AMS /MMP is used in Germany, Scotland, and elsewhere Party List Proportional Representation Party-list proportional representation is a voting system designed to achieve proportional representation (PR) In a closed parly list system, voters vote directly for the party. Parties make lists of candidates to be elected, and seats get allocated to each party in proportion to the number of votes the party receives. The larger the size of the constituency, the more proportional the result. There are variations to this system. Party Lists are also incorporated into other electoral systems eg Additional Member System Party Lists are used in israel, Italy and elsewhere. UK Members of the European Parliament are elected by a closed list system. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Alternative Vote (AV) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alternative Vote Plus (AV+) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Representation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct Party and Representative Voting (DPR Voting) DPR Voting is a direct replacement for the 'First past the post' - FPTP - voting system. It is a form of Proportional Representation based on single member constituencies for multi party parliamentary democracies. It does not require additional list or top up MPs. It has advantages over STV as a direct replacement for FPTP. see comparison |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DPR Voting is a way of introducing proportionality to our political system while retaining much of the existing familiar electoral system. It addresses the main criticisms of the FPTP and avoids the main criticisms of other proposed systems of electoral reform. The voter casts two votes: one for a constituency representative and one for a party. The introduction of DPR Voting would involve only the smallest change to our current electoral system. It would preserve the relationship between MPs and their constituents on the basis of a method of constituency election which is familiar. DPR Voting would achieve greater equality for the voter, greater voter choice, and a significant increase in proportionality at minimum cost and disruption. It could be simply and powerfully presented to the electorate as a fairer electoral system for Westminster. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STV |
DPR Voting |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PR |
STV – voting power in Parliament is approx proportional to overall votes |
DPR Voting – voting power in Parliament is proportional to overall votes |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Constituencies |
STV is intended for Multimember constituencies |
DPR Voting is intended for single member constituencies and would not need constituency sizes to change. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Constituency Boundaries. |
Boundaries and constituency size are potentially contentious, and are important to the way the system works |
Boundaries and constituency sizes are not important to the way the system works and do not affect the election result. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Party Neutrality |
STV favours, or works better with, a three party system |
DPR Voting can accommodate any number of parties but small party representation depends on where the threshold is set. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simplicity |
Ease of voting depends in part on the size of the constituency and the number of candidates. Counting is a complex process. The electoral system is difficult to explain. |
Voting and counting are simple, quick and familiar. The basics of the system are easy to explain It would require some changes to the way MPs vote in parliament |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wasted Votes |
A few. Some voters will still find that their first preference candidate never gets elected. |
There are no wasted votes. Every vote cast makes a (small) difference to the result of the election. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Safe Seats |
There are no safe seats in either system |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tactical Voting |
With STV, there is some scope for tactical voting. |
With DPR Voting, tactical voting is redundant. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
‘Marginals' |
The significance of Marginal Constituencies is much reduced. |
There are no Marginal constituencies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Voter Choice |
STV – the voter may have a choice of candidates from within one party from which to choose. |
DPR Voting – the voter has two votes, one for their choice of party, and one for their choice of MP. The voter can vote for the party of choice and the candidate of choice without the one compromising the other. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Party Lists |
Neither system uses a Party list. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In Parliament |
STV - Parliament would be populated with MPs from different parties in numbers broadly proportional to the votes cast for the parties. |
DPR Voting – Parliament would be populated with MPs considered to be the best potential MPs irrespective of party nomination. It is not possible to say if this would reflect the present plurality system or whether the mix would in time reflect overall voting trends. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Small Party Representation. |
STV would increase small party representation. |
DPR Voting makes small party representation proportional. For very small parties, this depends on the threshold for representation, and the party qualification requirements |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independent MPs |
It would be hard for Independent MPs to be elected because many votes will still be cast for a party label. In addition the candidate has a much larger constituency to campaign over. |
DPR Voting – Party labels would be less of a handicap to the Independent Candidates and the smaller constituency would make campaigning easier. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Psephology |
STV - interpreting voting results is complex. |
DPR Voting – Party voting would be simpler to interpret than under FPTP, but psephologists would find a brand new area of interest in local results to interpret, comparing and interpreting the winning MPs voting share with the winning party's voting share in the constituency. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Principal outcomes of DPR Voting: | |
| .. | |
| • A form of proportional representation is achieved with minimal change to the voting system. | |
| • The existing system of single member constituencies is retained. | |
| • The existing system of electing MPs is retained. | |
| • The elections of the MP and the party of government are not conflated, improving voter choice. | |
| • There are no safe seats. | |
| • Voting in 'marginal' constituencies cannot determine the election of the Government. | |
| • Simplicity of voting and counting is comparable with FPTP. | |
| • Each vote in every constituency makes a difference to the result of the election. | |
| • Frequent revision to constituency boundaries is not required to retain this fairness. | |
| .. | |
| Note: | Voting is not preferential |
| Multimember constituencies are not used | |
| Party Lists are not used | |
A brief summary of the different systems in use in the UK (House of Commons Library - a paper written in 2008) |
Direct Party and Representative Voting is a form of Proportional representation (PR) which has the simplicity of the existing 'First past the post' system, maintains the single member constituency, and requires little change to the existing voting system |
DPR Voting - simple, practical, yet powerful electoral reform
|





